The Movie Clybourne Park By Bruce Norris Essay

On Friday, September 23, the University of Central Florida Theatre Program performed Clybourne Park, written by Bruce Norris, which was directed by David Reed. Clybourne Park satirizes racism and how foolish people were in not being able to accept the differences among each other. The late 1950’s was a time when racism was at its peak, which caused serious turmoil amongst fellow American citizens. Clybourne Park is a play about how society needs to progress and embrace change. Set in 1959 Chicago in the first act, the neighborhood association is trying to prevent a colored family from buying a middle-class white family’s home. As the second act comes around, the story is set in the 2000’s in the same neighborhood, but now the neighborhood is predominately black. A white family is buying back into the neighborhood and change that home to counter what has come of the neighborhood. Due to the black box theater making the audience feel more in touch with the actors , it enhanced the experience and made it more believable. It felt as if the characters were talking directly to the audience and at some points, in the play, I wanted to chime in on what was happening because of how foolish some of the reasonings and arguments were. The actors words were believable, but considering the fact that I do not share the same beliefs as those frustrated with a black family moving into an all-white community, these words did not reside well with me. I do not relate to a specificShow MoreRelatedClybourne Park1002 Words   |  5 Pages Word Count: 1,002 Clybourne Park Essay The Broadway play â€Å"Clybourne Park† is based off the movie and play â€Å"The Raisin in the Sun†. It is written by Bruce Norris and was honored with many awards including the 2011 Pulitzer Prize for drama and the Tony Award for best play. Bruce Norris wrote the play by having it pick up right where â€Å"The Raisin in the Sun† left off. By doing this, Bruce Norris picks up where the drama was and shows the racial tensions in the 1950’s and 1960’s up until present

Differences in Ancient Rome and Han China - 944 Words

Han China and Classical Rome When comparing Han China and Classical Rome, many political, geographical, and religious similarities can be found, though many differences are also prevalent. Though Roman and Han political structures both emphasized bureaucracies, they came to them quite differently. Through copious amounts of expansion, both societies spread culture and earned money, though expansion was eventually their downfalls. Their religions differed immensely, with Rome emphasizing polytheism and Han China focusing on Confucianism. The differences and similarities between these two civilizations are to be discussed in this essay. Though both Rome and the Han dynasty were bureaucracies, both respective bureaucracies were quite†¦show more content†¦Though they were both able to trade due to their expansions and coasts, Rome did much more trade than Han China. Also, due to this vastness, both societies’ cultures were spread all over the world (which led to other civilizations forming) and their economies were boosted (which led to better conditions for the people). Religion in Rome and Han China had several similarities and differences. Not only did both their religions support political loyalty, and involvement, but they also played a huge role in society. Confucianism in Han China emphasized how to act towards others, especially parents and elders, and how to know ones place in society. Daoism there also emphasized nature and harmony, as Polytheism in Rome also focused on nature and how to care for and understand it. Polytheism in Rome was truly the center of all Roman tradition, as the gods and goddesses required many sacrifices and festivals in their honor. However, Confucianism was more of a social/political mindset than an actual religion, as it had no true god. Polytheism, however, had an overabundance of gods and goddesses, who were to be feared and regarded as sacred. It did not, however, focus on ethical thought and how to live, as Confucianism did extensively. Both Han China and Rome did have high tolerances for other religions, as long as they did not get in the way of state loyalty. Both societies’ political structures focused on Confucianism and polytheism, respectively, but the people were notShow MoreRelatedSimilarities Between Imperial Rome And Han China938 Words   |  4 Pages These two great empires Imperial Rome and Han China both had highly advanced political structures. These two empires both had highly political structures because Not only that but both of these two empires held on and retained many aspects from their previous empires or systems, like the Han Empire used aspects from the Qin dynasty while Imperial Rome used aspects from the Roman Republic. Another big similarity in these two EMpires was that they achieved great architectural achievements. TheRead MoreCompare And Contrast Rome And Han Empire1342 Words   |  6 PagesOver the last three centuries, Rome and the Han Dynasty were successful in their expansion throughout their respected parts of the world. Although both ran a very similar government, both successful civilizations did so using different methods. The Han would govern using imperial rule in addition to the Analects of Confucianism to run their political ideology. The Han Dynasty would eventually even change the text of the Analects per how they ruled through the original tablets. The Roman Empire wouldRead MoreHan China Essay858 Words   |  4 PagesImperial Rome and Han China had parallels and differences in methods of political control. The two civilizations both used the aspects of religion and belief systems to attain political influence over their subjects, but had differing methods to reach this goal. Standardization and cultural unity was a key factor in both civilizations regarding political control, as was expansion and growth of trade. The systems of belief of both Han China and Imperial Rome were quite different. Rome began withRead MoreROMAN EMPIRE AND THE HAN DYNASTY IN CHINA1441 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿ROMAN EMPIRE AND THE HAN DYNASTY IN CHINA Rodrick Carter HIEU 201 Liberty University 29 November 2014 Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty in China The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty in China are two kingdoms that, despite the geographical difference between them, managed to achieve great success and failure in equal measure. Both were characterized by imperial dynasties that were headed by the emperors and they held large territories. Both of these kingdoms faced various challenges afterRead MoreComparison on the Polybius from Punic Wars and Ssu-ma Chi’en995 Words   |  4 Pagesthe end of the third century B.C., there were two independent and strong powers existing separately at the southeast of China in Asia and at the core area of Mediterranean in Europe, the Han dynasty and Rome. They have both reached the high point of the contemporary civilizations. Also, they formed their empires by defeating their own hostile forces. There are significant differences between the two great empires in their process of birth, growth and perfection, ruling ideologies and institutions andRead MoreAnalyze Similarities and Differences in Techniques of Imperial Administration in the Following Empires. Han China (206 B.C.E.–220 C.E.), or Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.–476 C.E.)959 Words   |  4 PagesMost societies that developed in ancient civilizations were centered around some form of imperial administration and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) were no different in this sense. Both civilizations had a network of cities and roads, with similar technologies that catalyzed cultural amalgamation and upgraded the standard of living, along with comparable organizational structures. Additionally, both civilizations had problems managing their borders and usedRead MoreComparative Look At The Roman Empire And Han Dynasty Economies Essay1409 Words   |  6 Pages A COMPARATIVE LOOK AT THE ROMAN EMPIRE AND HAN DYNASTY ECONOMIES Scott Hosier History 111: World Civilization Before 1650 December 27, 2016 â€Æ' The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty had simple economies--when compared to current global economies--founded on agriculture, mining, trade, and taxation. Although those economies were straightforward it allowed civilizations to grow and eventually collapse. However, the two civilizations had drastically different methodologies on the exchange ofRead MoreThe Han Dynasty And Roman Empire1059 Words   |  5 PagesThe Han Dynasty ruled China from 206 B.C.E to 220 A.D, and Polybius wrote his account of Rome around 200 B.C.E. Though the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire existed simultaneously, they were vastly different because they were separated by thousands of miles and high mountain ranges. It is widely agreed upon that the two empires had very little contact, especially in the years when Polybius wrote his account. Though separated, the two empires developed their own societies that were highly sophisticatedRead MoreWomen and Their Roles in History2647 Words   |  11 Pagesthe society o f their time. These women of ancient civilizations have led us to the roles of women in our society today. They have boosted the standing of women in society and have tried to be individuals. In some time periods, women were controlled completely by men and in others they were moderately controlled by men. This paper will focus on the roles of women in certain areas. The civilizations that I analyzed closely were the Roman Empire, Han China, Classical Greece, Byzantium, Egypt, andRead MoreThe Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty Essay1272 Words   |  6 PagesROMAN EMPIRE AND THE HAN DYNASTY The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty Imagine being the head of government in one or two of the most famously remembered governments in the world’s history! The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty are two of the most famous governments in history. The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were governed in very different ways, however both contributed greatly to Western civilization. The Roman Empire was in power between 1,000 and 1,200 years. The Han Dynasty was in power

Is “Othello” Best Regarded as a Domestic Tragedy free essay sample

Written in 1604, during Shakespeare’s great tragic period, â€Å"Othello† is one of his most highly concentrated, tightly constructed tragedies, with no subplots and little humour to relieve the tension. Although he adapted the plot of his play from the sixteenth-century Italian dramatist and novelist Giraldi Cinthios Gli Hecatommithi, Shakespeare related almost every incident directly to the development of Iagos schemes and Othellos escalating fears. This structure heightens the tragedys ominous mood and makes the threat to both Desdemonas innocence and the love she and Othello share more terrifying.Because of its varied themes of racism, love, jealousy and betrayal the play remains relevant today and is still quite popular. A domestic tragedy takes place in a personal setting. In â€Å"Othello†, the men are in Cyprus to fight a war. However, the tragedy is the events within the relationships of the central characters. There is little discussion of the war and, although Desdemona blames state matters for Othellos change in behavior, the real problems Othello faces are matters of the heart. A tragedy of state is when the tragic events effect more than just the protagonist, but also the government or kingdom that they belong to. In â€Å"Othello†, when Othello dies much of Venice is shocked and mourns him, as they have lost a great soldier and a great friend to the noblemen. It can be argued that â€Å"Othello† is a domestic tragedy as opposed to a state tragedy because in essence, the only people affected are a man and his wife, and their closest confidents and there is no impact on society. Othello† also fits domestic tragedy conventions regarding the tragic protagonists being ‘ordinary’, middle-class or lower-class individuals. This subgenre contrasts with classical and neoclassical tragedy, in which the protagonists are of kingly or aristocratic rank and their downfall is an affair of state as well as a personal matter. Therefore â€Å"Othello† is suitable to this genre because the characters are not noble or royal. On the other hand â€Å"Othello† could be disputed to be a tragedy of state because Othello himself, as a character, is a Venetian general.In other Shakespeare plays such as â€Å"Macbeth†, â€Å"King Lear† and â€Å"Hamlet† society is also impacted on because the majority of them have, as their central characters, kings and queens. The tragic outcomes of the plays effect whole countries and their future politics. The character of Othello is that of a calm and polite man. He expresses a powerful and dignified persona. Apart from the negative racial pressure his skill as a soldier and leader is nevertheless valuable and necessary to the state, and he is an integral part of Venetian civic society. The Venetian government trusts Othello enough to put him in full martial and political command of Cyprus. This fact is evidence that the play could indeed be categorised as a tragedy of state, as he is so valued to the state, his death would leave an impact on their matter. The play is centred on the relationship between Othello and Desdemona. Othello clearly loves Desdemona and this is expressed by the way he addresses her and speaks of her â€Å"Fair lady† (act I sc. III) â€Å"Honey O my sweet, I prattle out of fashion, and I dote† (act II sc. I) â€Å"sweeting; come away to bed† (act II sc. III) â€Å"sweet Desdemon† (act III sc.III) ect. Later he goes on to describe her with such beauty and poise. The relationship between Othello and Desdemona is presented in different ways throughout the play. At the start it seems passionate and strong as it is not a physical love, but much deeper than that, Othello states; â€Å"She loved me for the dangers I had passed, And I loved her that she did pity them† (act I sc. III). As they battle the approval of Brabantio they are strong as a unit and that is presented by Desdemona defending her husband. However as the play progresses the strength of their relationship dwindles due to Iago’s interference.This is exposed by Othello’s growing concern about Desdemona’s affair, revealing that he obviously doesn’t trust her. As the play progresses even further it is blatant that their relationship is no more when Othello kills Desdemona in a jealous rage and a dismal attempt to save his pride. In Desdemona’s last words it is apparent that she and Othello’s relationship meant something to her and she is deeply hurt and saddened as she is â€Å".. . falsely murdered! † (act V sc. II). Yet staying true to her husband in a final act of love she tries to redeem him of wronging her by saying that she killed herself.Desdemona is a more plausible and well-rounded figure, a good, faithful and obedient wife. She tends to be seen and presented as a stereotypically weak and submissive character however we see in Act I Scene III that this is not the case when she declares her love for Othello and defends him against the claims of witchcraft that he faces. When asked where most she owes obedience, she retorts; â€Å"My noble father, I do perceive here a divided duty. To you I am bound for life, and education: My life and education both do learn me, how to respect you. You are the Lord of duty, I am hitherto your daughter.But here’s my husband; and so much duty, as my mother show’d to you, preferring you before her father: So much I challenge, that I may profess Due to the Moor my Lord. † (act I sc. III) However, as the marriage progresses she becomes very submissive, shown on the occasions when Othello is in a jealous rage and acts dismissive, rude and violent toward her. She does not retaliate, only obeys. â€Å"Be as your fancies teach you; whate’er you be, I am obedient† (act III sc. III) â€Å"Heaven keep the monster from Othello’s mind! † (act III sc. IV) and after Othello strikes her; â€Å"I have not deserved thisI will not stay to offend you. † Act V Scene II sees Othello smother Desdemona to her death and yet, in her final breath, she tries to defend him again by saying it was suicide. This must only prove her undying love and care for Othello. First to risk her relationship with her father to marry Othello, then to accept his unacceptable behaviour and to be so sympathetic and understanding in his jealous rage, to as go so far to forgive him for murdering her and trying to make it better for him shows that she fulfilled her role as a ‘wife’ and that she loved him very much.Desdemona herself is a member of a politically powerful family; she therefore elevates Othello’s status to the elite of Venice. Iago is the villainous character of the play. He is described by almost everyone in the play as ‘honest Iago’ (act II sc. III, act V sc. II) as he misrepresents himself as appearing to be honest, in order to deceive and misdirect people. He constantly tells Othello that he loves him and complies with him. Iago’s motive is simple and petty, he is furious with Othello for assigning Cassio as his lieutenant as oppose to himself.Therefore he convinces Othello into thinking that Desdemona is having an affair with Cassio. Although Othello is the protagonist, Iago has more lines and plays a bigger part in the play. Without Iago’s involvement, the play would not be so tragic. Some could say that Iago was the cause of Othello’s downfall. However this is not so true. Because, Othello was rashly influenced and chose to believe Iago’s lies, he was not forced to believe such insinuations. Still, he chose to believe these things, if only out of pride and fear of being made a fool of â€Å"Who would not make her husband a cuckold to make him a monarch? (act IV sc. III). Though Othello’s lack of self knowledge makes him an easy prey for Iago, once Iago triggers Othello’s jealousy and gets the darker aspects of Othello’s nature into action, there is nothing Othello can do to stop it, since he cannot even admit that he obtains these darker traits. Othello’s true personality is also responsible for his fate, with an inside battle between â€Å"the noble Moor† and the â€Å"Malignant and turbaned Turk† (act V sc. II), he is the victim of two sides fighting inside his body and soul, which results in the dramatic and tragic ending that takes place.The whole scenario happens so quickly but yet there are a few pivotal scenes that are relevant to domestic tragedy; Act III Scene III, Act IV Scene I, Act V Scene II. In conclusion, althoug h not fully following the classical tragedy conventions, I personally think that â€Å"Othello† is best regarded as a tragedy of state for the reasons that Othello is highly respected and ultimately needed by Venetians whilst being a ruler when in Cyprus. I feel that his death does impact on society as he befriended many and he was the finest general in the Venetian army.