The Supreme Court Of The United States - 1140 Words

Originally, I had thought there was no way something so sacred should be allowed to be defaced, but I have quickly realized the constitution is much more powerful and sacred. As a nation, we must pick our fights and the hills we die on. It will not and never should be considered treason to burn the flag, however there is, like with most things a catch twenty-two. Publicly and privately the burning of the flag is accepted as freedom of speech, but once this simple gesture turns into a hazard we must act. President Trump and conservatives may view it as weak, but a system of penalties or citations would be the correct form of punishment. We should follow the lead of other progressive nations and fine those who attempt to burn the flag in†¦show more content†¦The U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed and reaffirmed that the right to desecrate the flag is included in the Constitution’s protection of speech.† (Flag Burning or Desecration). Tolerance is in fact exactly what allows for the burning of the flag, tolerance in the form of expression. Allowing someone to express their feelings for Lebron James or Colin Kapernick is, and should be the same for tolerating the expression one feels for the flag. It is simply put, wrong to deny the citizens of the United States the right to burn or desecrate their property. This idea of intolerance, because it is offensive is not accepted under the constitution. Time and time again the Supreme Court has stood by its decision to defend the constitutional right of flag desecration as a right and freedom of speech. So, I ask why not make it completely illegal to burn the flag in public? Let’s change the way we view this expression. Like the many other countries who issue fines or even jail time for defacing the flag, we should do the same. Is the idea so radical? Is it really an infringement on the first amendment? The answer is no, the burning of the flag will never be illegal, or should I say should never be illegal, but that doesn’t mean we can’t stand up and tell the world that we respect our country as much as we appreciate and respect the people’s rights? The solution to these questions is oh soShow MoreRelatedThe Supreme Court Of The United States1087 Words   |  5 PagesThe Supreme Court of the United States is thought to be the keep going word on legitimate choices, being profoundly particular about which cases it considers. It just acknowledges cases that have been through the lower courts and offers forms until there are no different choices and no taste ful determination to the current issue. This paper will talk about four of the eight judges of the Supreme Court and a brief synopsis of what their jobs entail as a supreme court judge. The motivation behindRead MoreThe United States Supreme Court928 Words   |  4 PagesThe United States supreme court is the head of the judicial branch of the American government and was created to balance out the powers of both the legislative and executive branches. Here in the U.S. the government is essentially owned and operated by a two party system that consistently votes against one another, even if the proposed idea is one that individual members of both parties could agree on. Given the way the system runs, it would make sense to maintain a supreme court made up of equalRead MoreThe Supreme Court Of The United States754 Words   |  4 PagesThe Supreme Court of the United States ruled on a major case that will affect millions of Americans in one way or another. This ruling has been decades in the making and was certainly going to be controversial no matter how it turned out. The key issue is whether or not gays and lesbians had the same constitutional right that heterosex ual people do in regards to marriage. Not too long ago the concept of this even being considered by the high court would’ve been unfathomable. The 5 to 4 court rulingRead MoreThe United States Supreme Court1715 Words   |  7 PagesScotus blog, the United States Supreme Court judges against a familiar foe were at their best. It was very easy putting doctrinal clodhopping aside in trying out the amateur court team. Birchfield v. North Dakota a Wednesday court case involving laws imposing on motorist’s criminal penalties for being suspected of drunken driving (Birchfield v. North Dakota, 2016). Furthermore, when a chemical test, especially for breath or blood, was rejected. North Dakota with other eleven states passed measuresRead MoreSupreme Court Of The United States2133 Words   |  9 Pages â€Æ' Supreme Courts Nomination in the United States Introduction The Supreme Court is considered the highest-ranking court the in the United States. It is composed of nine judges referred to as justices. The main purpose of having these justices is so that they can make rulings on cases that the junior court cannot settle. Supreme Court judges make the final decision on whether a law is consistent with the underlying constitution. All Supreme Court justices serve lifetime appointments, whichRead MoreThe Supreme Court Of The United States1884 Words   |  8 PagesARGUMENT I. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES SHOULD AFFIRM THE LOWER COURT’S DECISION BECAUSE THE ASTON CITY PANHANDALING ORDINANCE IS A VALID, CONTENT-NEUTRAL TIME, PLACE, AND MANNER RESTRICTION OF SPEECH AND THEREFORE DOES NOT VIOLATE PETITIONERS FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT. (Jerica Johnson) The First Amendment to the United States Constitution states that government â€Å"shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech . . . .† U.S. Const. amend. I. Nevertheless, the First Amendment protectionRead MoreThe Supreme Court Of The United States2906 Words   |  12 PagesCite as: 571 U.S. _____ (2014) Opinion of the Court SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES __________ No. 13-1499 __________ Lanell Williams-Yulee v. The Florida Bar ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT [12.10.2014] JUSTICE SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court. Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, and Justice Kennedy concurred and Justice Ginsburg, Justice Sotomayor, Justice Breyer and Justice Kagan dissent with the majorityRead MoreThe United States Supreme Court2944 Words   |  12 PagesAcclaim for asserting the United States Supreme Court as a substantial participant in the American structure of government has been ascribed to the guidance of John Marshall as Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1801 to 1835. By 1835, the Supreme Court had attained a level of equality with the prowess and prestige as that of Congress and the Executive that was not present before John Marshall was appointed to the position. Central to this development was the Court s adoption of the ConstitutionRead MoreThe Supreme Court Of The United States1943 Words   |  8 PagesIn the Supreme Court of the United States Bradley, Petitioner v. Georgia Respondent Brief for Petitioner SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS The information provided by the anonymous informant is not credible. The court established in Aguiler v. Texas (1964), created a test to determine whether an informant tips could be used as probable cause to search warrants and Spinelli v. United States which developed the Aguiler-Spinelli test fully. Bradley’s 4th amendment right to unreasonable searchRead MoreThe Supreme Court Of The United States1905 Words   |  8 PagesIn the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO Petitioner, V. LUIS M. SANCHEZ VALLE AND JAIME GOMEZ VAZQUEZ Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF NATASHA JOHNSON STATEMENT OF INTEREST As someone in support of statehood for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, this case holds special significance. I am a firm believer that Puerto Rico has been treated unjustly as a territory by the United States, and this